|
The woman teaching and having authority over a man |
![]()
|
Sisters in
the Lord, you must learn in silence with all submission; therefore without
grumbling and without interrupting him who is teaching the Word of God. So,
when the Church comes together in one place (that is, during the worship
service) you must not talk with anybody, rather you must keep silent “for it
is shameful for women to speak in church” (1 Corinthians 14:35 - NKJV), says
Paul; and if you want to learn something, do not ask the pastor (while the
church Is gathered together in one place), but ask your husbands at home, as
it is written: “And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own
husbands at home” (1 Corinthians 14:35 – NKJV). You ought to keep silent in
the churches, for women “are to be submissive, as the law also says” (1 Corinthians
|
|
Therefore,
since you, sisters, must learn in silence, you are not allowed to teach the
doctrine of God, that is, the same doctrine that Paul, Peter and the other
apostles taught to the saints and which Paul commanded Timothy and Titus to
teach. Neither are you allowed to exercise authority over your husband because
he is your head and you are to submit to him. |
|
To sum up,
therefore, what I have just said: “Let a woman learn in silence with all
submission. And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a
man, but to be in silence” (1 Timothy |
|
|
|
A woman is
not permitted to teach |
|
|
|
With
regard to the fact that a woman is not permitted to teach, the law also
confirms it, and we know that the law is made for whatever is contrary to the
sound doctrine (1 Timothy 1:10). For, when God chose the Levites, under the
law of Moses, to entrust them with the service of the tabernacle and that
they might teach His laws to the Israelites, as it is written: “They shall
teach Jacob Your judgments, and Israel Your law” (Deuteronomy 33:10 – NKJV)
he chose men and not women. |
|
I can
confirm this also by what we read in the book of Nehemia, for in the days of
Nehemiah and Ezra, after the temple and the walls of Jerusalem were rebuilt,
when the law of God was read and explained publicly before the people, that was
done by some men from among the Levites, as it is written: “Also Jeshua, and
Bani, and Sherebiah, Jamin, Akkub, Shabbethai, Hodijah, Maaseiah, Kelita,
Azariah, Jozabad, Hanan, Pelaiah, and the Levites, caused [helped] the people
to understand the law: and the people stood in their place. So they read in
the book in the law of God distinctly, and gave the sense, and caused [helped]
them to understand the reading” (Nehemiah 8:7-8). On the basis of these
passages, nowadays among the Jews (the Orthodox Jews) the woman is not
permitted to read the law publicly in the synagogue nor to explain any
passage of the law to the congregation. |
|
Obviously,
the New Testament’s writings confirm that a woman is not permitted to teach, for
the twelve apostles appointed by Jesus, whom He sent to preach (Matthew
10:1-8; Luke 6:12-16) were all men, as well as the seventy disciples whom He
appointed afterward and sent before His face (Luke 10:1). |
|
There were
of course some women who followed Jesus, but they did not teach the Word of
God, for they ministered to Jesus and His disciples, as Luke says: “The
Twelve were with Him, and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits
and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out;
Joanna the wife of Cuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many
others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means”
(Luke 8:1-3 - NIV). As you can see, the women who were with Jesus and His
disciples did not preach nor teach the Word of God, but they provided for
Jesus and His disciples from their substance. Is it not written: “Let him who
is taught the word share in all good things with him who teaches” (Galatians
6:6 – NKJV)? |
|
|
|
Replies to
the main objections |
|
|
|
Let us now
reply to the main objections raised by some sisters and brothers. |
|
● ‘Since a woman can prophesy, she can teach
because he who prophesies teaches’. |
|
That’s not
true, because the gift of prophecy and the gift of teaching are two different
gifts, they are not the same gift. That is confirmed by Paul when he says:
“Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, let
us use them; if prophecy, let us prophesy in proportion to our faith; or
ministry, let us use it in our ministering; he who teaches, in teaching” (Romans
12:6-7 – NKJV). Bear in mind this, that Paul did not say: ‘I do not permit a
woman to prophesy’ because such a statement would have contradicted the
Scripture which says: “Your daughters shall prophesy” (Joel |
|
● ‘According to the Scripture, a woman can
serve as a deaconess, which means that she can also teach’ |
|
That’s not
true; now I am going to explain why. The Word declares that in the |
|
● ‘A woman can teach because in ancient
times God appointed some women prophetesses’. |
|
That’s not
true, for the ministry of prophet is different from the ministry of teacher,
and the fact that one is a prophet does not necessarily mean that he is able
to teach. Deborah (who lived in the days of the judges), Huldah (who lived in
the days of king Josiah) and Anna (who lived in the days of Jesus), were all
prophetesses, but they were not appointed by God to teach the law to the
people because according to the law of Moses the precepts of the law had to
be taught by the Levites, as God said: “For the lips of a priest should keep
knowledge, and people should seek the law from his mouth” (Malachi 2:7 –
NKJV). |
|
The
prophet Micah also made a distinction between the office of a priest and the
office of a prophet, for when God rebuked the people of Israel through him He
said: “Her priests teach for pay, and her prophets divine for money” (Micah
3:11 – NKJV). As you can see, it was the priests and not the prophets who were
appointed to teach. |
|
A woman,
under grace, can be appointed by God prophetess, but to be a prophet does not
mean to be enabled by God to teach the Word; a woman who is a prophetess
prophesies by the Spirit when the Spirit comes upon her, and tells the visions
and the revelations God gives to her, but this does not mean at all that God
has appointed her to teach the doctrine of God. In order to be able to teach,
a prophetess needs to possess also the ability to teach, but that’s an
ability which she can’t receive from God. |
|
● ‘A woman can teach because when Jesus rose
from the dead He appeared first to a woman, that is, Mary Magdalene, to whom
He said: “Go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and
your Father; and to my God, and your God” (John 20:17)’ |
|
Now,
according to the Scripture, “Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that
she had seen the Lord, and that He had spoken these things to her” (John |
|
To confirm
this I remind you that the Scripture says that (after the Spirit was poured
out upon the Church) the early believers “continued steadfastly in the
apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers”
(Acts |
|
● ‘A woman can teach because Anna was a
prophetess’. |
|
Now, Anna
was a prophetess who “departed not from the temple, but served God with
fastings and prayers night and day” (Luke |
|
● ‘A woman can teach because some of the
women who helped Paul taught the Word of God’. |
|
These
women, according to this objection, were Priscilla, Euodias, and Syntyche, for
it is written: “And he [Apollos] began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom
when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded
unto him the way of God more perfectly” (Acts 18:26), and again: “I beseech
Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord. And
I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me
in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose
names are in the book of life” (Philippians 4:2-3). |
|
Now, if
the above mentioned passages meant that Priscilla, Euodias and Syntyche did
teach the Word, that would mean that Paul permitted them to teach. Then, if
it were so, Paul told a lie to Timothy, because He told him that he did not
permit a woman to teach. So, who says the truth? Those who say that these
passages mean that those women taught or Paul? Perhaps we might say that Paul
permitted some women to teach while he did not permit other women to teach!
But if it were so, how could Paul say to Timothy: “I charge thee before God,
and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these
things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality” (1
Timothy 5:21)? The truth is that Priscilla, Eudioas and Syntyche did not
teach. At most, we can say that Priscilla and her husband |
|
I am
convinced that you, sisters, ought to follow the example of Mary, Martha’s
sister, who “sat at Jesus’ feet and heard His word” (Luke |
|
|
|
A woman is
not permitted to exercise authority over her husband |
|
|
|
I said
before that a woman is not permitted to exercise authority over her husband,
let us see therefore how a woman must behave towards her own husband. Paul
wrote: “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the
church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject
unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing” (Ephesians
|
|
Now, the
Church is the Lamb’s wife and she must submit to Her head, that is, Christ
Jesus, therefore just as the Church submits to Christ with all reverence and
doesn’t dare to exercise authority over the Christ of God, so, in the same
manner, the wife must submit to her husband. |
|
Sarah is
an example of a woman who submitted to her husband, for the Scripture says
that “Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord” (1 Peter 3:6 - NKJV). I would
like to point out that even though she was submissive to her own husband, she
was not a slave of her husband but a free woman, as it is written that
“Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a free-woman” (Galatians
4:22). Why do I say this? Because some women think that in ancient times the
wives of the patriarchs were treated and regarded as bondwomen. Consider
this: the holy women who trusted in God were submissive to their own
husbands, and because of their respectful behaviour they are called
‘bondwomen’! The reason why today many women think that those holy women were
bondwomen is that they think that in this modern age for women to submit to
their husbands, as did those holy women, is absurd. Today, what should be a
normal thing for a woman, is considered outdated and inadequate; therefore,
no wonder that many women do not want to submit to their husbands. Those
women who call the obedience and the submission of Sarah towards Abraham
‘bondage’ are nothing but women who have become slaves of a perverse way of
thinking, and if they want to escape the snare of the devil into which they
have fallen they must repent and obey the truth. |
|
We live in
the midst of a crooked and perverse generation which has perverted the
straight ways of the Lord, and we see with our eyes that many so called
‘feminist movements’ have risen and these movements are fighting against God,
for their purpose is contrary to the sound doctrine of God. The fight which
is called ‘the fight in favour of the emancipation of women’ is nothing but a
device used by Satan to destroy the family. Furthermore, there are some women
who do not know what the verb ‘to emancipate’ means. Now, to emancipate means
‘to set free from slavery’ and when a married woman says that she wants to
become an emancipated woman she means that she wants to stop obeying her
husband and submitting to him, and if she is unmarried she means that she
doesn’t want to submit to man. After the woman was deceived and fell into
transgression, God said to the woman: “Your desire shall be for your husband,
and he shall rule over you” (Genesis 3:16 – NKJV); these words were spoken by
God, the Creator of all things, and the woman, who is just a creature, has
decided to nullify the Word of God. Will she manage to nullify it?’ No, she
won’t. Did her struggle improve our society? No, it didn’t, rather things in
this world are going from bad to worse, and we see that what the woman is
doing in order to emancipate herself is hastening the destruction of the
family. Am I wrong in saying that divorces and separations are increasing in
number because of the perverse ideas displayed by the feminists, who are
under the leadership of the devil? Am I wrong in saying that today a woman
who is obedient and submissive to her own husband is considered by the
feminists (who are filled with hate
for the Word of God because it reduces their claims to silence) a crazy and
ignorant woman, and thus they encourage her to rebel against her husband to
claim her ‘rights’? Today that old serpent, that is, Satan, is still deceiving
the woman: he began in the Garden of Eden and is actively prosecuting his
diabolical work to this day. Satan knows how to deceive the woman; he knows
that it is sufficient to make her believe that God is a liar in order to
cause her to fall into transgression. What did God say to Adam? He said: “In
the day that you eat of it [that is, of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil] you shall surely die” (Genesis 2:17 – NKJV); but what did the serpent
say to Eve: “You will not surely die” (Genesis 3:4), and she believed the serpent
and ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thinking that she
would not die, and the baleful consequences of that disobedience can be still
clearly seen today. |
|
Sisters, I
exhort you to obey the Word of God and not to deceive yourselves (by thinking
that the freedom proclaimed by the feminist movements is useful to you and to
your families). The true freedom is in the Lord, for it is written: “Where
the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Corinthians |
|
Daughters
of |
|
|
|
The reasons
of these prohibitions |
|
|
|
Now, let
us see why the woman is not permitted to teach nor to exercise authority over
her husband but she must keep silent. Paul says that it is because “Adam was
formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being
deceived, fell into transgression” (1 Timothy |
|
Therefore
the reasons of this prohibitions to women are these. |
|
First,
because man was not created for the woman, but woman for the man (1 Corinthians
11:9), as it is written that after God formed Adam, He said: “It is not good
that the man should be alone” (Genesis |
|
Second, because
in the Garden of Eden it was not Adam who was deceived but Eve. Paul confirms
this by saying to the Corinthians: “The serpent deceived Eve by his
craftiness” (2 Corinthians 11:3 - NKJV). Why is it not written that the
serpent deceived Adam by his craftiness? Because it is not true that the
serpent deceived Adam. Of course, when Adam ate of the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil he sinned, as it is written: “Like Adam they have broken the
covenant – they were unfaithful to me there” (Hosea 6:7 – NIV), and again:
“By the one man’s offense many died” (Romans 5:15 – NKJV). But we need to say
all the truth about what happened in the garden of Eden, by saying that the
serpent deceived Eve and not Adam. The woman herself recognized that she was
deceived, for – after both she and her husband had sinned - when God said to her:
“What is this you have done?” (Genesis |
|
Therefore,
women, submit to your own husbands as is fitting in the Lord, and do not have
the presumption to teach. Be humble and respectful and you will be honored by
God and by all those who love God and fear Him. Do not think about the so
called emancipation of women, because you have already obtained the true
freedom, and this freedom is in the Lord. |
|
|
|
Some other
words about the emancipation of women |
|
|
|
The
emancipation of women is a thing that the women of this world likes very
much, because through it women and men are put on the same level both in
society and in the family. Unfortunately, this so called emancipation of
women is accepted even by many sisters in the Lord, who want at all costs to
be considered equal to men and not inferior to them (in roles and functions),
and therefore they don’t want to submit to them. So, besides going to work to
earn their monthly salary (because the salary earned by their husbands was
considered insufficient and humiliating to them), they took hold of the
pulpit in some Churches and thus they are behind the pulpit teaching and
rebuking the brethren. On the other hand, they say, if in Christ there is
neither male nor female, why should only men have the opportunity to become
pastors or elders?!! |
|
First of
all, I want to speak to you, women who keep the Word of God: take heed to
yourselves and do not let this diabolical feeling enter you because it is a
cancer which would destroy you, your family and the Church you belong to.
Know this, that your head is man and whether you are married or not you must
submit to man and as sign of this submission you must cover your head with a
veil when you pray or prophesy. Be submissive to your husbands and respect them,
love them and take care of them. Know that he needs you and by doing the
housework you are a great helper to him. |
|
Now
listen, you ‘emancipated’ sisters, how long will you follow vanity and love
lies? Is it not time for you to come to your senses and cast away your
haughtiness and stop thinking that you have the same rights as men have? Do
you not realize that since you gave heed to this so called emancipation you
and your families have become less and less spiritual? Don’t you see that you
are nervous, restless, full of worries and anxieties? Don’t you see that you
are neglecting your husbands, who are forced to bear the baleful consequences
of your so called emancipation? And what shall I say about your children?
Don’t you see that they are growing bad because during the day you are not
with them but you see them only in the evening when you have supper?
Therefore, stop deceiving yourselves and walk according to the Word of God,
that is, submit to your husbands and be busy at home. Resign from your post
and work in your house where there is plenty of work for you to do. Then you
will see that the money earned by your husband is enough to live, and it is
not absolutely humiliating to you. |
|
Now, I
want to say something to you brothers who reject the emancipation of women.
Continue to abhor it for the sake of your wives and your families; you will
be called male chauvinists, antifeminists, selfish persons, etc, but don’t
worry about that. |
|
On the
contrary, I say to those who accept the emancipation of women: ‘Stop
supporting it. Don’t you see how many harms it has done to our society and to
your family? Don’t you see the evil things caused by it in the midst of the
Church? |