Angelology
|
3. Who were the sons of God of Genesis 6:2, of whom the Scripture says
that they married the daughters of men? |
|
They were
angels, for the angels of God are called ‘the sons of God’ in the book of Job,
as it is written: “Whereupon
are the foundations [of the earth] thereof fastened? or
who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together, and
all the sons of God shouted for joy?” (Job 38:6-7). I say that the sons of
God who shouted for joy when God laid the foundations of the earth were
angels and not human beings for man had not yet been created, in that man was
made on the sixth day while the earth was made before. That is the only
explanation which can be given to those words. |
|
The fact
that the sons of God of Genesis 6:2 were angels is confirmed by the apostle
Peter as well as by Jude. Peter says that “God spared not the angels that
sinned, but cast them down to hell [Tartarus], and delivered them into chains
of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment” (2 Peter 2:4), and Jude says: “And
the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation,
he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of
the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like
manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh,
are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” (Jude
6-7). In relation to the words of Jude, I would like you to notice that he
says that Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities about them gave themselves up to fornication
and perversion in like manner or in a similar way, that is to say, they committed
fornication as those angels which kept not their first estate, but left their
own habitation. |
|
Some
believers say that those sons of God were human beings (according to this
interpretation, they were men who at that time called upon the name of the Lord)
and not angels. But this interpretation is not correct because if those sons
of God were human beings and not angels, it would not make sense to say that
“the sons of God saw the
daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which
they chose” (Genesis 6:2) for it would be tantamount to saying that the sons
of men saw the daughters of men that they were fair and they married them.
What kind of strange or unusual thing would have happened? I don’t think that
in that case there would have been something strange or unusual. Instead, the
writer, inspired by the Holy Spirit, called those beings ‘sons of God’ for
their nature was different from the nature of human beings. Thus the writer
wanted to highlight the different nature which existed between the sons of
God and the daughters of men, in that the sons of God were angels while the daughters
of men were women born from the union of man and woman. This is confirmed by
the passage that points out the time when that event occurred, as it is
written: “And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the
earth, and daughters were born unto them” (Genesis 6:1), for it is evident
that the angels could see the beauty of the daughters of men only after the
daughters of men were born. |